apenwarr-redo/t/950-curse/clean.do

rm -f *~ .*~ *.n0 *.n1 *.n2 *.tmp *.count countall *.countall
t/curse: add a Makefile so we can compare speed when using GNU make. redo: 5.4s redo -j4: 3.0s make: 2.3s make -j4: 1.4s make SHELL=/bin/dash: 1.2s make SHELL=/bin/dash -j4: 0.83s We have some distance to go yet. Of course, redo is still written in python, not C, so it's very expensive, and the on-disk dependency store is very inefficient. 2010-11-21 00:31:48 -08:00			`rm -f ~ .~ .n0 .n1 .n2 .tmp .count countall .countall`
t/curse: test that 'redo' (not redo-ifchange) always redoes a command. ...if the containing .do file is getting redone at all, of course. Currently passes in serial mode, fails in parallel. 2010-11-19 02:10:44 -08:00
t/curse: test to make sure the same file isn't generated more than once. redo currently passes this when running serially, but not in parallel. 2010-11-19 00:55:36 -08:00