apenwarr-redo/t/deps/test1.do

# force-rebuild t1dep
redo t1dep

if [ -e t1a ]; then
	BEFORE="$(cat t1a)"
else
	BEFORE=
fi
../flush-cache
redo-ifchange t1a  # it definitely had to rebuild because t1dep changed
AFTER="$(cat t1a)"
if [ "$BEFORE" = "$AFTER" ]; then
	echo "t1a was not rebuilt!" >&2
	exit 43
fi
Test for the previous bugfix. This fails if you make test twice without the preceding patch. Unfortunately I couldn't find a good way to make it fail if you only make test once. 2010-11-21 04:29:28 -08:00			`# force-rebuild t1dep`
			`redo t1dep`

			`if [ -e t1a ]; then`
			`BEFORE="$(cat t1a)"`
			`else`
			`BEFORE=`
			`fi`
Rename flush-cache.py to flush-cache, and rearrange the code a bit. It was working fine, but the style wasn't exactly the way I like it, because I'm unnecessarily picky. :) Also, removed the file extension since we should probably learn from the fact that it's already been rewritten once from one language to another. Who knows, maybe it will be again someday. 2011-02-23 01:24:48 -08:00			`../flush-cache`
Test for the previous bugfix. This fails if you make test twice without the preceding patch. Unfortunately I couldn't find a good way to make it fail if you only make test once. 2010-11-21 04:29:28 -08:00			`redo-ifchange t1a # it definitely had to rebuild because t1dep changed`
			`AFTER="$(cat t1a)"`
deps/test1.do: fix an == vs. = In sh's [] command, you should use =, not ==. I got away with this because bash accepts ==, but that's non-portable. 2010-11-27 21:48:43 -08:00			`if [ "$BEFORE" = "$AFTER" ]; then`
Test for the previous bugfix. This fails if you make test twice without the preceding patch. Unfortunately I couldn't find a good way to make it fail if you only make test once. 2010-11-21 04:29:28 -08:00			`echo "t1a was not rebuilt!" >&2`
			`exit 43`
			`fi`