apenwarr-redo/t/chdirtest.do

. ./skip-if-minimal-do.sh

rm -f chdir1
redo chdir2
redo chdir3

./flush-cache.sh
redo-ifchange chdir3

rm -f chdir1
./flush-cache.sh
redo-ifchange chdir3
[ -e chdir1 ] || exit 77

rm -f chdir1
./flush-cache.sh
redo-ifchange chdir3
[ -e chdir1 ] || exit 78
Disable the tests that don't work with minimal/do. ...only when running under minimal/do, of course. The tests in question mostly fail because they're testing particular dependency-related behaviour, and minimal/do doesn't support dependencies, so naturally it doesn't work. 2010-12-11 20:54:46 -08:00			`. ./skip-if-minimal-do.sh`

Correctly handle dependencies for "cd somewhere; redo-ifchange somefile" We would build 'somefile' correctly the first time, but we wouldn't attach the dependency on somefile to the right $TARGET, so our target would not auto-rebuild in the future based on somefile. 2010-11-24 03:06:18 -08:00			`rm -f chdir1`
This tests the chdir-related bug from the previous commit. 2010-11-25 06:31:06 -08:00			`redo chdir2`
			`redo chdir3`

flush-cache: run it as a separate program, not using 'source' That way it doesn't clutter up 'redo -x' as much. 2010-12-08 20:16:26 -08:00			`./flush-cache.sh`
This tests the chdir-related bug from the previous commit. 2010-11-25 06:31:06 -08:00			`redo-ifchange chdir3`
Correctly handle dependencies for "cd somewhere; redo-ifchange somefile" We would build 'somefile' correctly the first time, but we wouldn't attach the dependency on somefile to the right $TARGET, so our target would not auto-rebuild in the future based on somefile. 2010-11-24 03:06:18 -08:00
This tests the chdir-related bug from the previous commit. 2010-11-25 06:31:06 -08:00			`rm -f chdir1`
flush-cache: run it as a separate program, not using 'source' That way it doesn't clutter up 'redo -x' as much. 2010-12-08 20:16:26 -08:00			`./flush-cache.sh`
This tests the chdir-related bug from the previous commit. 2010-11-25 06:31:06 -08:00			`redo-ifchange chdir3`
Correctly handle dependencies for "cd somewhere; redo-ifchange somefile" We would build 'somefile' correctly the first time, but we wouldn't attach the dependency on somefile to the right $TARGET, so our target would not auto-rebuild in the future based on somefile. 2010-11-24 03:06:18 -08:00			`[ -e chdir1 ] \|\| exit 77`
This tests the chdir-related bug from the previous commit. 2010-11-25 06:31:06 -08:00
			`rm -f chdir1`
flush-cache: run it as a separate program, not using 'source' That way it doesn't clutter up 'redo -x' as much. 2010-12-08 20:16:26 -08:00			`./flush-cache.sh`
This tests the chdir-related bug from the previous commit. 2010-11-25 06:31:06 -08:00			`redo-ifchange chdir3`
			`[ -e chdir1 ] \|\| exit 78`