From 637521070ba0aa9aefe9fff325867cf5da5a6ea4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Avery Pennarun Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2018 04:17:19 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] t/all.do: use redo instead of redo-ifchange. I'm not quite sure what I was thinking, using redo-ifchange there, but the result was that some tests wouldn't run if you run 'redo test' repeatedly, even after modifying redo itself. Also tweaked t/950-curse so that it always runs, not just the first time. --- t/950-curse/all.do | 2 ++ t/all.do | 2 +- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/t/950-curse/all.do b/t/950-curse/all.do index e8ac2e4..b436dd5 100644 --- a/t/950-curse/all.do +++ b/t/950-curse/all.do @@ -1,3 +1,5 @@ +rm -f *.n[012] + . ./check-1.sh redo-ifchange 1.n0 2.n0 3.n0 DEPS=$(./seq 10 | sed 's/$/.n1/') diff --git a/t/all.do b/t/all.do index 70c1291..f1831e0 100644 --- a/t/all.do +++ b/t/all.do @@ -15,4 +15,4 @@ xargs redo # builds the rest /bin/ls [2-9][0-9][0-9]*/all.do | sed 's/\.do$//' | -xargs redo-ifchange +xargs redo