If you use "redo --old-args", it will switch back to the old
(apenwarr-style) arguments for now, to give you time to update your .do
scripts. This option will go away eventually.
Note: minimal/do doesn't understand the --old-args option. If you're using
minimal/do in your project, keep using the old one until you update your use
of $1/$2, and then update to the new one.
apenwarr-style default.o.do:
$1 foo
$2 .o
$3 whatever.tmp
djb-style default.o.do:
$1 foo.o
$2 foo
$3 whatever.tmp
apenwarr-style foo.o.do:
$1 foo.o
$2 ""
$3 whatever.tmp
djb-style foo.o.do:
$1 foo.o
$2 foo.o (I think?)
$3 whatever.tmp
The reason we'd crash is that we tried to pre-create a file called
$target.redo.tmp, which wouldn't work because the directory containing
$target didn't exist.
We now try to generate a smarter filename by using the innermost directory
of target that *does* exist. It's a little messy, but the idea is to make
sure we won't have to rename() across a filesystem boundary if, for example,
there's a mounted filesystem in the middle of the hierarchy somewhere.
Since we use ". filename.do" to run the .do files instead of just
"filename.do", shell local variables end up being inherited by the
subprogram. Change all the local variables to be all lowercase, to avoid
conflicting with any typical environment variables someone might use.
The particular variable that triggered this was PREFIX (reported by "ulrik"
on the mailing list) and that fixes this, at least.
Arguably we shouldn't be using ".", but using it avoids unnecessary forks,
which is kind of nice.
If you ". ./filename" and ./filename contains no commands, apparently
ash/dash will give the exit code of the command *before* the ., rather than
defaulting to zero as it supposedly should. This should work around it in
our .do files at least.
Reported by Tim Allen.
It should just build nothing. Because sometimes you want to do something
like:
redo-ifchange $(find -name '*.c')
And the find doesn't return any results. This is consistent with what real
redo does.
Added a test to confirm that it works.
Sometimes clean.do implementations want to delete our .do_built file and
directory. If that happens, deal with it quietly, as long as they don't
request any *additional* redo-type operations.
Apparently emacs sets TERM=dumb in its tty simulator, so even though
isatty() returns true, we shouldn't use colour codes. (emacs is therefore
lame. But we knew that.)
If all.do runs and creates no output, we shouldn't create a file called
'all', but we should remember that 'all' has been run successfully. We do
this by creating 'all.did' during the build.
Since minimal/do always just wipes everything out every time it runs, we can
safely remove the .did files after minimal/do terminates, so this doesn't
clutter things too much in normal use.
This fixes some edge cases, particularly that 'minimal/do clean' no longer
leaves stupid files named "clean" lying around, and the redo-sh directory
can now be rebuilt correctly since we rebuild it as long as redo-sh.did
doesn't exist. (We don't want to "rm -rf redo-sh" because it makes me
nervous.)
...only when running under minimal/do, of course.
The tests in question mostly fail because they're testing particular
dependency-related behaviour, and minimal/do doesn't support dependencies,
so naturally it doesn't work.
Just allow that sub-redo to return an error code. Also, parent redos should
return error code 1, not the same code as the child. That makes it easier
to figure out which file generated the "special" error code.
It actually decreases readability of the .do files - by not making it
explicit when you're going into a subdir.
Plus it adds ambiguity: what if there's a dirname.do *and* a dirname/all?
We could resolve the ambiguity if we wanted, but that adds more code, while
taking out this special case makes *less* code and improves readability.
I think it's the right way to go.
This greatly reduces the number of fork+exec calls, so in particular,
t/curse/all.do now runs much faster:
/bin/sh (bash): was 5.9s, now 2.2s
/bin/dash: was 3.2s, now 1.1s
Obviously improving the speed of minimal/do doesn't really matter, except
that it makes a good benchmark to compare the "real" redo against. So far
it's losing badly: 5.4s.
This could be good for distributing with your packages, so that people who
don't have redo installed can at least build it. Also, we could use it for
building redo itself.
Will surely need to get slightly bigger as I inevitably discover I've
forgotten a critical feature.
