When we can't find a .do file, we walk all the way back to the root
directory. When that happens, the root directory is actually searched
twice. This is harmless (since a .do file doesn't exist there anyway)
but causes redo-whichdo to produce the wrong output.
Also, add a test, which I forgot to do when writing whichdo in the
first place.
To make the test work from the root directory, we need a way to
initialize redo without actually creating a .redo directory. Add a
init_no_state() function for that purpose, and split the necessary path
functions into their own module so we can avoid importing builder.py.
The new format is just a list of .do files we tried, with a newline
after each one. If we successfully found a .do file, we exit 0, else
we exit 1.
As discussed on the redo-list mailing list, it's easier to parse
without the extra cruft. This makes users figure out $1 and $2
themselves, but that's not very hard, and maybe for the best.
For example:
$ redo-whichdo a/b/c/.x.y
- a/b/c.x.y.do
- a/b/default.x.y.do
- a/b/default.y.do
- a/b/default.do
- a/default.x.y.do
- a/default.y.do
- a/default.do
- default.x.y.do
- default.y.do
+ default.do
1 a/b/c.x.y
2 a/b/c.x.y
Lines starting with '-' mean a potential .do file that did not exist,
so we moved onto the next choice (but consider using redo-ifcreate in
case it gets created). '+' means the .do file we actually chose. '1'
and '2' are the $1 and $2 to pass along to the given .do file if you want to
call it for the given target.
(The output format is a little weird to make sure it's parseable with
sh 'read x y' calls, even when filenames contain spaces or special
characters.)
