% redo(1) Redo %VERSION% % Avery Pennarun % %DATE% # NAME redo - rebuild target files when source files have changed # SYNOPSIS redo [options...] [targets...] # DESCRIPTION redo is a simple yet powerful tool for rebuilding target files, and any of their dependencies, based on a set of rules. The rules are encoded in simple `sh`(1) scripts called '.do scripts.' redo supports GNU `make`(1)-style parallel builds using the `-j` option; in fact, redo's parallel jobserver is compatible with GNU Make, so redo and make can share build tokens with each other. redo can call a sub-make (eg. to build a subproject that uses Makefiles) or vice versa (eg. if a make-based project needs to build a redo-based subproject). Unlike make, redo does not have any special syntax of its own; each *target* is built by running a .do file, which is simply a shell script that redo executes for you with a particular environment and command-line arguments. If no *targets* are specified, redo pretends you specified exactly one target named `all`. Note that redo *always* rebuilds the given targets (although it may skip rebuilding the targets' dependencies if they are up to date). If you only want to rebuild targets that are not up to date, use `redo-ifchange`(1) instead. A .do script can call redo recursively to build its dependencies. # OPTIONS -j, --jobs=*maxjobs* : execute at most *maxjobs* .do scripts in parallel. The default value is 1. -d, --debug : print dependency checks as they happen. You can use this to figure out why a particular target is/isn't being rebuilt when your .do script calls it using `redo-ifchange`. -v, --verbose : pass the -v option to /bin/sh when executing scripts. This normally causes the shell to echo the .do script lines to stderr as it reads them. Most shells will print the exact source line (eg. `echo $3`) and not the substituted value of variables (eg. `echo mytarget.redo.tmp`). -x, --xtrace : pass the -x option to /bin/sh when executing scripts. This normally causes the shell to echo exactly which commands are being executed. Most shells will print the substituted variables (eg. `echo mytarget.redo.tmp`) and not the original source line (eg. `echo $3`). -k, --keep-going : keep building as many targets as possible even if some of them return an error. If one target fails, any target that depends on it also cannot be built, of course. --shuffle : randomize the order in which requested targets are built. Normally, if you run `redo a b c`, the targets will be built exactly in that order: first `a`, then `b`, then `c`. But if you use `-j`, they might end up being built in parallel, so it isn't safe to rely on this precise ordering. Using `--shuffle`, redo will build its targets in random order even without `-j`, which makes it easier to find accidental dependency problems of this sort. NOTE: if you really just want to guarantee that `a` is built, then `b`, then `c`, you can just run three `redo` commands consecutively. Because your .do script is just a script, it will not be accidentally parallelized. --debug-locks : print messages about acquiring, releasing, and waiting on locks. Because redo can be highly parallelized, one instance may end up waiting for a target to be built by some other instance before it can continue. If you suspect this is causing troubles, use this option to see which instance is waiting and when. --debug-pids : add the process id of the particular redo instance to each output message. This makes it easier to figure out which sub-instance of redo is doing what. # DISCUSSION The core of redo is extremely simple. When you type `redo targetname`, then it will search for a matching .do file based on a simple algorithm. For example, given a target named `mytarget.a.b.c.d`, redo will look for a .do file in the following order: - mytarget.a.b.c.d.do - default.a.b.c.d.do - default.b.c.d.do - default.c.d.do - default.d.do - default.do In all cases, the .do file must be in the same directory as the target file, or in one of the target's parent directories. For example, if given a target named `../a/b/xtarget.y`, redo will look for a .do file in the following order: - $PWD/../a/b/xtarget.y.do - $PWD/../a/b/default.y.do - $PWD/../a/b/default.do - $PWD/../a/default.y.do - $PWD/../a/default.do - $PWD/../default.y.do - $PWD/../default.do The first matching .do file is executed as a `/bin/sh` script. The .do script is always executed with the current working directory set to the directory containing the .do file. Because of that rule, the following two commands always have exactly identical behaviour: redo path/to/target cd path/to && redo target (Note: in `make`(1), these commands have confusingly different semantics. The first command would look for a target named `path/to/target` in `./Makefile`, while the second command would look for a target named `target` in `./path/to/Makefile`. The two Makefiles might give completely different results, and it's likely that the first command would have incomplete dependency information. redo does not have this problem.) The three arguments passed to the .do script are: - $1: the target name (eg. mytarget.a.b) - $2: the basename of the target, minus its extension (eg. mytarget) - $3: a temporary filename that the .do script should write its output to. Instead of using $3, the .do script may also write the produced data to stdout. If the .do file is in the same directory as the target, $1 is guaranteed to be a simple filename (with no path component). If the .do file is in a parent directory of the target, $1 and $3 will be relative paths (ie. will contain slashes). redo is designed to update its targets atomically, and only if the do script succeeds (ie. returns a zero exit code). Thus, you should never write directly to the target file, only to $3 or stdout. Normally, a .do script will call other .do scripts recursively, by running either `redo` (which will always build the sub-target) or `redo-ifchange` (which only rebuilds the sub-target if its dependencies have changed). Running `redo-ifchange` is also the way your .do script declares dependencies on other targets; any target that is `redo-ifchange`d during your .do script's execution is both executed (if needed) and added as a dependency. You may have heard that 'recursive make is considered harmful' (http://miller.emu.id.au/pmiller/books/rmch/). Unlike `make`(1), redo does correct locking, state management, and global dependency checking, so none of the arguments in that essay apply to redo. In fact, recursive redo is really the only kind of redo. # RELATED COMMANDS When writing a .do script, it will probably need to run one or more of the following commands: `redo` : to build a sub-target unconditionally. `redo-ifchange` : to build a sub-target only if the sub-target's dependencies have changed. `redo-ifcreate` : to tell redo that the current target must be rebuilt if a particular file gets created. `redo-always` : to tell redo that the current target must always be rebuilt, even if someone calls it using `redo-ifchange`. (This might happen if the current target has dependencies other than the contents of files.) `redo-stamp` : to tell redo that even though the current target has been rebuilt, it may not actually be any different from the previous version, so targets that depend on it might not need to be rebuilt. Often used in conjunction with `redo-always` to reduce the impact of always rebuilding a target. # CREDITS The original concept for `redo` was created by D. J. Bernstein and documented on his web site (http://cr.yp.to/redo.html). This independent implementation was created by Avery Pennarun and you can find its source code at http://github.com/apenwarr/redo. # SEE ALSO `sh`(1), `make`(1), `redo-ifchange`(1), `redo-ifcreate`(1), `redo-always`(1), `redo-stamp`(1)